news-ca

California Bans Kars4Kids Ad: Find Out Why

A controversial charity advertisement, known for its catchy jingle, has been banned in California. The ban follows a court ruling that found Kars4Kids violated state false advertising laws. The ads, featuring children singing while soliciting car donations, have been familiar to Canadian audiences for years.

Legal Action Against Kars4Kids

The ban stems from a lawsuit filed in 2021 by Bruce Puterbaugh, a California cabinetmaker. After donating a 2001 Volvo XC valued at $250, Puterbaugh believed he was aiding a charity for underprivileged children nationwide. However, he later discovered that Kars4Kids primarily raises funds for a Jewish organization, Oorah.

Court Findings

The ruling issued by Judge Gassia Apkarian highlighted that Oorah’s initiatives include programs such as matchmaking for young adults and gap year trips to Israel. This revelation contradicted the expectations of many donors, including Puterbaugh.

Kars4Kids and Charity Ratings

  • Kars4Kids has received a one-star rating from Charity Intelligence Canada.
  • The rating indicates significant transparency issues and failure to adequately report on the use of donations.

Kate Bahen, the managing director at Charity Intelligence Canada, emphasized the importance of this rating, warning potential donors to consider better giving options. When inquiring about whether any funds from Kars4Kids help Canadian children, the organization’s public relations director, Wendy Kirwan, did not provide a clear answer.

Funding and Operations

Kars4Kids Canada operates as part of Oorah, which is registered as a charity with the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). Recent Canadian tax filings revealed that Oorah transferred approximately $12.6 million to the United States and Israel for various projects. These include funding for educational institutions and community programs.

Future of Kars4Kids

In response to the California ruling, Kirwan expressed that Kars4Kids Canada is a separate entity from its American counterpart. She criticized the court’s decision, declaring it flawed and misapplied the law. Kirwan is optimistic about winning an appeal, asserting that the facts support their position.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button