Ghislaine Maxwell Seeks to Overturn Sex Trafficking Conviction in Federal Court

Ghislaine Maxwell, former associate of Jeffrey Epstein, has filed a motion to overturn her sex trafficking conviction in federal court. This request comes as she seeks to have her 20-year prison sentence set aside. Maxwell claims “substantial new evidence” has emerged that indicates constitutional violations tainted her original trial.
Details of Maxwell’s Motion
In a habeas petition submitted on a Wednesday, Maxwell argues that crucial evidence was withheld during her trial, which took place in 2021. She asserts that false testimony was presented against her, leading to what she describes as a “complete miscarriage of justice.” Her legal team highlighted that new evidence from civil actions, government disclosures, and investigative reports undermines the fairness of her conviction.
Impact of New Evidence
- Maxwell’s filing emphasizes that the cumulative effect of these issues makes a reasonable conviction impossible.
- The timing of the motion coincides with the upcoming public release of records related to her case, mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
- This act, signed by U.S. President Donald Trump, requires the Justice Department to release a range of Epstein-related documents by December 19.
Background on Ghislaine Maxwell
Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking in December 2021 after being arrested in July 2020. She is currently serving her sentence in a Texas prison camp, having been moved from a federal facility in Florida.
Legal Proceedings and Implications
Following her petition, the Justice Department indicated plans to release several categories of materials from the Epstein investigation, including:
- Search warrants
- Financial records
- Victim interview notes
- Data from electronic devices
Maxwell’s attorney, David Markus, cautioned that releasing such materials could severely prejudice her prospects for a fair retrial if her petition succeeds.
Future Developments
While a judge has authorized the release of these records, Markus argued that they contain untested allegations against Maxwell. U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton reaffirmed his commitment to follow the law regarding document release.
The ongoing scrutiny of Maxwell’s case and the associated Epstein files continues to unfold, highlighting the complexities of the legal issues at play.



