Feds Charge Two with Gun Crimes After FBI’s Metro Detroit Terror Raids

Federal authorities have charged two men from Dearborn, Michigan, with serious gun crimes related to an alleged plot supporting the Islamic State. The charges come after recent FBI raids, which were part of a broader investigation into a supposed terrorist attack aimed at an LGBTQ+ nightclub in Ferndale.
Details of the Allegations
Mohmed Ali and Majed Mahmoud, both residents of Dearborn, were implicated in a conspiracy involving five alleged co-conspirators, including a juvenile. Investigators claim that they engaged in reconnaissance, firearms training, and stockpiling weapons. These activities centered around identifying potential attack locations in downtown Ferndale, known for its vibrant LGBTQ+ community and various establishments.
Background of the Investigation
According to an FBI criminal complaint, the investigation began in July when encrypted communications revealed plans for a terrorist attack in the U.S. The FBI reported that Ali purchased an AR-15-style rifle and ammunition over the summer. By October, Mahmoud reportedly bought over 1,600 rounds of ammunition.
The charges against Ali and Mahmoud include receiving, transferring, and conspiring to transfer firearms with knowledge that these weapons might be used in terrorist activities. Each firearm-related felony is punishable by up to 15 years in federal prison.
FBI Raids and Arrests
These charges followed high-profile raids conducted by the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, which took place just a few days earlier in Dearborn and Inkster. Five individuals, aged 16 to 20, were arrested during these actions. FBI Director Kash Patel emphasized that the swift actions of law enforcement had thwarted a potential terrorist act that was planned for the Halloween weekend.
Responses from Defense Attorneys
- Mahmoud’s attorney, Bill Swor, withheld comments pending his review of the criminal complaint.
 - Amir Makled, representing another of the accused, denied any involvement in a terror plot, asserting that a mass-casualty event was never planned.
 
Legal experts have raised concerns regarding the nature of the investigation and the statements made by officials, suggesting that the evidence presented may not support the severity of the charges.
Conclusion
This case underscores the ongoing challenges posed by domestic terrorism. It also highlights the complexities of balancing national security with civil liberties. As the investigation continues, more details are likely to emerge. El-Balad will provide updates on this developing story.
				



