U.S. Representative-elect Adelita Grijalva from Arizona won a special election with 69% of the votes. Her father, Raul Grijalva, who served the state until his death on March 13, 2025, left a vacancy that required this election under Article 1, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. Adelita’s victory on September 23 was uncontested, cementing her position as the next representative.
Delay in Swearing-In Process
Traditionally, newly elected representatives are sworn in quickly after their elections. However, Adelita Grijalva has faced an unusual delay. House Speaker Mike Johnson has not administered her oath, contrary to the norms established under his leadership.
Grijalva has requested to be sworn in for over a month, yet Speaker Johnson has no clear justification for his refusal. This situation raises questions about the effect of her vote on Republican legislation and other pressing issues, such as the anticipated release of the Epstein files.
Constitutional Implications
The situation highlights a significant constitutional concern. Article 1, Section 5 states that each House is responsible for judging the qualifications and elections of its members. Despite no contest regarding Grijalva’s eligibility, her representation for over 800,000 Arizona citizens is being hindered.
House Sessions and Legal Action
The House has convened for nine sessions since Grijalva’s election, particularly on dates such as September 26 and October 21. During these meetings, she could have been sworn in. On October 21, Arizona and Grijalva initiated a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. This legal action emphasizes the House’s lack of authority to exclude a duly elected representative.
- Adelita Grijalva’s election date: September 23, 2025
- Vote percentage: 69%
- Raul Grijalva’s passing: March 13, 2025
- House sessions since election: 9
- Legal action initiated: October 21, 2025
Conclusion: A Call for Action
The refusal to seat Grijalva not only undermines her electoral victory but also deprives Arizona constituents of their right to representation. Speaker Johnson’s actions contradict his obligations under the Constitution and pose a threat to democratic principles. It is crucial for Speaker Johnson to adhere to his duties and ensure that Grijalva is sworn in promptly.
The ongoing political standoff serves as a reminder of the necessity for upholding democratic values. Both parties should prioritize the interests of the American public over partisan tactics.
