During the recent debate in New Brunswick, candidates Sherrill and Ciattarelli tackled critical issues surrounding abortion rights in New Jersey. This event aimed to clarify their positions ahead of the upcoming elections.
Ciattarelli’s Position on Abortion Rights
Ciattarelli was questioned about his support for including the right to abortion in the state constitution. He confirmed his endorsement of a woman’s right to choose but expressed concerns over the current administration’s approach.
- Ciattarelli emphasized: “I don’t support celebrating abortion.”
- He voiced his opposition to New Jersey becoming “the abortion capital of the country.”
Furthermore, Ciattarelli mentioned advocating for parental notification when minors undergo abortions. He compared this to the existing law that requires parental permission for minors to get piercings. His argument was focused on accountability, stating:
“But we’re not gonna notify parents when a 16 or 17-year-old is having an abortion performed? I think that’s terribly wrong.”
Sherrill’s Counterarguments
In response, Sherrill accused Ciattarelli of spreading misinformation. She stated that stringent regulations proposed by Ciattarelli could have dangerous consequences for women.
- “When you put in place things like my opponent has suggested, people die,” Sherrill asserted.
- She also highlighted his past actions, noting that he voted to defund Planned Parenthood, which she argued undermines a pro-choice stance.
Key Takeaways from the Debate
The debate showcased two distinct perspectives on abortion rights in New Jersey. Ciattarelli advocates for parental notification and expresses a cautious stance on current abortion policies. Conversely, Sherrill champions unrestricted access to abortion and criticizes proposals she views as harmful.
The importance of these discussions is amplified as New Jersey voters prepare for the elections. With differing views on abortion, both candidates aim to connect with constituents throughout this critical time.
