Tufts Student Held on $10,000 Bail for Assaulting Boston Officer at Rally

A Tufts University student has been charged following a violent pro-Palestinian protest in Boston, leading to his arrest and a subsequent bail setting of $10,000. Roder Atwood, aged 21 and residing in Somerville, pleaded not guilty to multiple charges, including assault and battery on a police officer, at a Boston Municipal Court hearing.
Details of the Incident
The protest, which occurred on a Tuesday evening, began peacefully on the Boston Common but escalated into violence. As demonstrators blocked traffic near Park Street MBTA station, police attempted to clear the area to allow emergency access. Prosecutor Olivia Izzi reported that the situation deteriorated when demonstrators resisted police orders.
Arrests and Injuries
- Thirteen individuals were arrested during the rally.
- Atwood is among those facing serious charges.
- Four police officers sustained injuries, with some requiring hospitalization.
In the aftermath of the altercations, protesters allegedly surrounded police cruisers, leading to further chaos. Some officers incurred broken bones and back injuries while managing the crowd.
The University’s Response
Tufts University officials have stated they are cooperating with Boston police. A spokesperson emphasized their commitment to accountability for any student involved in illegal actions during the protest.
Atwood was ordered to maintain a distance from the Boston Common if he posts bail. His next court appearance is scheduled for October 30, 2025. Meanwhile, the other twelve individuals arrested ranged in age from 19 to 28 and are also from the Boston area, facing charges of resisting arrest and disorderly conduct.
City Officials’ Remarks
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu expressed gratitude towards the police, reinforcing the importance of maintaining public safety and condemning violence in protests. “Boston will not tolerate violence and we categorically condemn those who came into our community to attack our police officers,” Wu stated.
Conclusion
This incident reflects ongoing tensions and challenges related to public demonstrations in urban settings. The legal repercussions for those involved will unfold as the court proceedings continue.