Lee Anderson Ejected from Commons for Accusing PM of Lying About Mandelson

Lee Anderson, a member of the Reform UK party, was expelled from the House of Commons after making strong accusations against Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. The incident occurred during a session where MPs discussed the appointment of Lord Peter Mandelson as the U.S. Ambassador.
Incident Overview
During the Prime Minister’s statement regarding Lord Mandelson’s appointment, Anderson accused Starmer of lying. He stated, “The problem is no one believes him. The public don’t believe him.” He further declared, “That man couldn’t lie straight in bed!” This statement was met with immediate reprimand from Speaker of the House, Sir Lindsay Hoyle.
Speaker’s Intervention
Speaker Hoyle cautioned Anderson against using such language in the Commons. He asked, “Sorry, we don’t use those words, and I’m sure the member’s withdrawn it?” However, Anderson refused to retract his statement, asserting his steadfastness regarding his accusation.
- Speaker ordered Anderson to leave the House.
- Anderson stated, “Mr Speaker, I have the greatest respect for you, but I will not withdraw.”
Prime Minister’s Statement
The upheaval followed a detailed address from Starmer about Mandelson’s appointment timeline. In his remarks, Starmer expressed regret for appointing Mandelson. He emphasized that he received no information regarding a failed security vetting by Foreign Office officials prior to the appointment.
- Starmer discovered the vetting issue on April 14, 2025, after Mandelson had already taken up his position.
- The Prime Minister mentioned that the Foreign Office granted Mandelson developed vetting clearance against established recommendations.
Reacting to the Incident
In response to the uproar, Starmer conveyed his astonishment at the lack of communication from relevant officials regarding the vetting process. He stated, “I do not accept that I could not have been told about the UK’s denial of security vetting before Peter Mandelson took up his post.”
This incident highlights the ongoing tensions within UK politics. It reflects the contentious atmosphere as opposition members call for accountability from government officials regarding appointments and the vetting process.




