The filming of the highly anticipated movie “It Ends With Us” has been described by actress Jenny Slate as “a really gross and disturbing shoot.” This alarming statement emerged from recently unsealed court documents, just days before a critical hearing related to Blake Lively’s sexual harassment case against Justin Baldoni and the producers of the film.
Background of the Case
Lively’s legal battle began after she filed a complaint with the California Civil Rights Department on December 20, 2024. The actress alleges that Baldoni subjected her to harassment on set. She claims to have experienced retaliation and inappropriate conduct from Baldoni and others during the production.
Key Documents Unsealed
- Date of Documents: June 4, 2023
- Key Figures Involved: Jenny Slate, Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni, Colleen Hoover, Christy Hall, Isabela Ferrer
- Specific Charges: Harassment and vilification by Baldoni and Wayfarer’s CEO Jamey Heath
The court filings include numerous exchanges revealing the tense atmosphere on set. Notably, a text from Jenny Slate called Baldoni “the biggest clown and the most intense narcissist.” This characterization of Baldoni reflects Lively’s assertion of a toxic environment fueled by inappropriate behavior.
Allegations of Smear Campaign
In her case, Lively alleges that a smear campaign was launched against her online. This was purportedly in response to her accusations against Baldoni and the Wayfarer team. The lawsuit, set for trial in May, seeks damages of approximately $500 million for the harm done to Lively’s reputation and personal life.
The Role of Sony Pictures
Recent filings clarified Sony Pictures’ involvement in the production. Lively took charge of editing her own version of the film, which was released in August 2024. Balancing pressures from Sony and Wayfarer Studios, Lively says her involvement was essential for its success.
“`
Details of the Edit and Checks on Accountability
- Released Version: Lively’s edit became the primary cut of the film.
- Involvement: Lively asserts that her edits were crucial for maintaining the integrity of her image.
- Response from Studio: There was internal disagreement over the film’s final cut and marketing strategy.
“`
The actress maintains her involvement was driven by the necessity to ensure a product she felt comfortable with, rather than a desire for control. She notes that she did not receive additional compensation for her efforts in editing the film.
Current Status and Future Proceedings
As the summary judgment hearing approaches, Lively’s legal team is optimistic about her chances in court. The unsealed documents are seen as a pivotal factor in articulating the challenges faced by women working in such environments.
As the situation develops, both sides remain attentive to the implications of the claims made and the responses from involved parties. The court’s decision will likely shape the landscape for Lively and other actresses in Hollywood.
