Senior Labour MP Condemns US Actions in Venezuela as Illegal

The recent US military action in Venezuela, which resulted in the removal of President Nicolas Maduro, has sparked significant controversy. Numerous political figures in the UK, especially within the Labour Party, are denouncing the actions as breaches of international law.
Criticism from UK Labour Officials
Dame Emily Thornberry, chair of the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, was one of the first senior Labour MPs to voice disapproval. She characterized the strikes as “not a legal action,” emphasizing that there is no proper justification for such military intervention.
In an interview on BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour, Thornberry stated, “This is an unacceptable breach of international law.” She underscored the need for the UK and its allies to collectively reject such actions, warning against the implications of allowing countries to operate outside of established legal frameworks.
Responses from Other Political Parties
Several opposition parties, including the Liberal Democrats, Greens, and the Scottish National Party, have also condemned the US strikes. They argue that such military actions undermine global security, regardless of the perceived legitimacy of Maduro’s presidency.
- Sir Ed Davey, leader of the Liberal Democrats, referred to Maduro as “a brutal and illegitimate dictator” but insisted that unlawful attacks jeopardize safety for all.
- Zack Polanski from the Green Party termed the strikes a blatant violation of international law.
- John Swinney of the SNP stressed that all nations must adhere to international rules.
Current UK Government Stance
The UK government has remained cautious, withholding a definitive statement regarding the legality of the US actions. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has avoided condemning the strikes directly, asserting that the US must provide justifications for its military operations.
In his comments, he acknowledged that the removal of an “illegitimate president” is seen by some as a positive move, but emphasized the importance of a peaceful transition to democracy.
International Implications
The actions taken by the US raise concerns about escalating geopolitical tensions. Thornberry warned that such an approach could embolden leaders like Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, as they assert control over their respective spheres of influence.
As the situation unfolds, the United Nations Security Council is expected to address the legality of the US operation. UK Minister Mike Tapp refrained from commenting on the country’s stance regarding a potential vote on this issue, citing a lack of information about the legal basis for the US action.
In summation, the robust debate surrounding the US military actions against Venezuela highlights significant divisions within UK politics regarding foreign intervention and respect for international law. This evolving narrative will likely shape future discussions as more details emerge.




