The upcoming municipal elections in Laval have sparked a significant controversy involving Mayor Stéphane Boyer and the city’s Senior Support Program. Claude Larochelle, a candidate from the Laval Party, has accused Mayor Boyer of inappropriately utilizing city resources for electoral gain.
Mayor’s Alleged Misuse of Senior Program
Laval’s Senior Support Program, which benefits residents aged 65 and older, provides financial assistance ranging from $150 to $300. Larochelle claims that this year’s distribution of checks was accompanied by a letter signed by Mayor Boyer, intentionally timed to align with the municipal election campaign.
Key Details of the Controversy
- Date of Letter: The letters were dated October 1, 2025, coinciding with the election period.
- Recipients: Over 30,000 elderly residents received checks.
- Accusations: Larochelle argues that such mailings during an election period violate ethical standards for public fund use.
Larochelle stated, “This letter becomes an electoral expense and should not be funded by the city.” His sentiments were echoed by Frédéric Mayer from Action Laval, who expressed concerns over the ethical implications of this practice.
City’s Defense and Routine Practice
The City of Laval maintains that sending letters alongside checks is standard protocol established for at least three years. Mayor Boyer’s office strongly rebuffed the allegations, asserting their commitment to the Senior Support Program and dismissing the claims as unfounded attempts to discredit the administration.
Formal Complaint and Investigation
In response to what he considers political manipulation of public funds, Larochelle filed a complaint with the Director General of Elections in Quebec (DGEQ). He emphasized that had the letters been sent earlier, they would not be perceived as election-related communications.
“Using city resources to contact over 30,000 voters in a bid for re-election is unacceptable,” Larochelle declared.
Implications and Expert Opinions
Former Municipal Affairs Minister Rémy Trudel highlighted the situation’s complexity, raising questions about the adherence to the election laws in Quebec. He advised caution, suggesting that seeking the DGEQ’s opinion would be prudent in navigating these circumstances.
The DGEQ is now tasked with determining whether the mayor’s letter constitutes an illegal electoral expense under current laws. The outcome of this investigation could have significant implications for the ongoing political landscape in Laval as the elections approach.
