Colombian President Gustavo Petro has claimed that a recent US-struck boat was “Colombian with Colombian citizens inside.” This allegation has been dismissed by the White House as “baseless.” In recent weeks, the US military has targeted at least four vessels in the Caribbean, resulting in the deaths of 21 individuals.
Background of US Strikes in the Caribbean
The US government asserts that these strikes were aimed at “narco-traffickers” operating in international waters. However, they have not disclosed specific details or evidence regarding the identities or activities of those on the targeted vessels. This lack of transparency has led to criticism from various nations in the region, raising concerns about potential violations of international law.
Political Reactions
The US Senate recently rejected a proposal aimed at limiting President Trump’s military authority regarding these vessels. The measure sought to require congressional approval before any military action could be taken. It was defeated on a vote of 48 to 51.
- Senators Schiff and Tim Kaine introduced the measure.
- The vote was largely divided along party lines.
Amidst these developments, President Petro responded to a tweet from Senator Adam Schiff. Schiff indicated his support for a legislative block against the US military strikes in the Caribbean. Petro characterized the situation as a “new war scenario” emerging in the region. He called for families of the victims to report their missing relatives and stated that “there is a war for oil” that needs global intervention.
US Government’s Position
The White House responded to Petro’s claims, expressing hope that he would retract his statements. While acknowledging the existence of policy differences, they emphasized their commitment to working closely on shared interests, including regional security and stability.
Since September 2, the US has positioned these strikes as essential to combating illegal drug trafficking. A leaked memo indicates that the US now views itself as engaged in a “non-international armed conflict,” potentially allowing for expanded military actions under wartime powers.
Conclusion
The unfolding situation highlights the tensions between Colombia and the US regarding military actions in the Caribbean. As President Petro calls for more transparency, the international community watches closely, concerned about the implications for regional stability.
