EU Chief Vows Firm Response to Trump’s New Tariff Threats

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized a united response from the European Union (EU) to new tariff threats issued by U.S. President Donald Trump. Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, she expressed concern over Arctic security and the potential fallout of Trump’s actions.
EU’s Firm Stance Against Trump’s Tariff Threats
Von der Leyen warned that the U.S. risks deteriorating its relations with EU allies, which could have severe implications. Trump’s proposed tariffs of 10% on eight countries, including Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden, are set to take effect on February 1. The tariff rate could increase to 25% by June 1.
The tariffs stem from a U.S. dispute over Greenland, which Trump has shown interest in acquiring. His administration has made remarks about possible military options regarding the island, despite persistent opposition from Denmark and Greenland.
Diplomatic Responses and Implications
The newly announced tariffs have triggered outrage and discussions of potential countermeasures among European leaders, including retaliatory tariffs. Additionally, the EU is considering the use of a rarely employed anti-coercion tool designed to restrict access to EU services and investments.
- Trump’s tariffs affect eight countries: Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, along with threats impacting military presence in Greenland.
- U.S. tariffs will start at 10% on February 1 and rise to 25% in June.
Leaders such as French President Emmanuel Macron highlighted the importance of respect in international relations, indicating that Europe has robust tools to deal with such coercive tactics. Macron insisted that collective actions should be taken when agreements are disregarded.
The Strategic Importance of Greenland
Greenland, the world’s largest island with a population of around 57,000, holds strategic significance for the U.S., especially for its military positioning. The island is crucial for ballistic missile defense and access to its mineral wealth aligns with U.S. objectives to reduce dependency on China.
Despite ongoing discussions, there is a lack of broad support for aggressive actions toward Greenland among the American public. Recent surveys indicate that many Americans oppose the prospect of a takeover.
Future Developments
As the situation unfolds, members of Congress are beginning to voice opposition to Trump’s Greenland ambitions. The U.S. military currently operates at Pituffik Space Base in northwest Greenland, a facility known as Thule airbase.
Denmark’s Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen reiterated the country’s openness to discussing military and territorial matters pragmatically. This stance reflects a desire to maintain cooperative relations while addressing the evolving geopolitical landscape.
The EU is scheduled to hold further discussions regarding Greenland and potential responses to U.S. actions, emphasizing the importance of security collaboration among European allies.




