The US Supreme Court has denied the Trump administration’s request to deploy National Guard troops in Chicago. This decision comes amidst opposition from local and state officials. The court’s unsigned order indicates that the president’s authority to federalize the National Guard is limited to exceptional circumstances.
Background of the National Guard Deployment Request
The National Guard typically comprises state-based troops that respond to disasters and large protests. The Trump administration aimed to use these troops to manage protests related to federal immigration actions in Democrat-led cities like Chicago, New Orleans, Portland, and Washington DC. President Trump has argued that deploying the National Guard is crucial to reduce violence and enforce law and order.
Legal Challenges and Court Rulings
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker praised the Supreme Court’s ruling, calling it a significant win for democracy in Illinois. Local officials and leaders challenged Trump’s plans legally. A lower court had previously blocked the deployment of National Guard personnel, stating that the protests in Chicago did not qualify as a “rebellion” threatening the state.
- Supreme Court ruling: 6-3 decision keeping lower court’s decision in place.
- Justices dissenting: Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch.
The Supreme Court’s Position
The justices emphasized that the government failed to identify a legal basis supporting the military’s involvement in enforcing laws in Illinois. This ruling serves to maintain the current status quo in one of the nation’s largest metropolitan areas.
The White House has yet to publicly respond to the Supreme Court’s decision. While President Trump has employed military personnel in major cities, this ruling marks the first time the Supreme Court has addressed his actions directly.
