Sen. Cortez Masto Fights Trump Tariffs with No Coffee Tax Act

In a recent response to rising coffee prices attributed to tariffs, Nevada’s Senator Catherine Cortez Masto has introduced the No Coffee Tax Act. This legislation seeks to eliminate the coffee tariffs that significantly increased costs for consumers and businesses alike.
Impact of Tariffs on Coffee Prices
Since President Trump’s tariffs were announced in April, coffee prices soared by 40% year-over-year. This increase is alarming for coffee lovers and local businesses across the United States. With approximately 99.9% of U.S. coffee beans imported, primarily from Brazil, these tariffs impose a hefty 50% charge on incoming beans.
Cortez Masto’s Legislative Response
Senator Cortez Masto’s No Coffee Tax Act aims to revert tariffs back to 0%. This move is essential for restoring affordability to consumers and encouraging support for local coffee businesses. Mark Trujillo, owner of Hub Coffee Roasters in northern Nevada, expressed the burden these tariffs impose. His business has raised prices between 30% and 60% due to increased operational costs linked to tariffs.
Legal Developments on Tariff Policies
On another front, the U.S. Supreme Court recently heard arguments regarding the legality of the administration’s tariffs. President Trump remarked on the importance of maintaining flexible tariff policies for national security. The court is expected to issue a decision soon, which could affect how tariffs are applied in the future.
- Senator: Catherine Cortez Masto
- Legislation: No Coffee Tax Act
- Price Increase: 40% year-over-year
- Current Tariff Rate: 50% on coffee imports
- Local Business Price Increase: 30% to 60%
- Supreme Court Decision: Expected in coming weeks
The changes in coffee pricing due to tariffs have raised concerns among consumers and business owners. Through measures like the No Coffee Tax Act, Senator Cortez Masto is advocating for the reversal of these burdensome tariffs. As developments unfold, the coffee industry remains watchful of potential legal shifts regarding tariff policies.



