Miller Moss, the quarterback for the University of Louisville, has been nominated as a class representative in the ongoing House v. NCAA case. With previous plaintiffs no longer enrolled, attorneys for college athletes filed a motion to include Moss in the case this month. If approved, he will advocate for the interests of current college athletes regarding injunctive relief as part of the $2.8 billion settlement approved by U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken.
Miller Moss: Background and Current Role
Moss, who transferred to Louisville from the University of Southern California (USC), is pursuing a master’s degree in social entrepreneurship. His interest in NCAA regulations on amateurism dates back to his time at USC, where he wrote his undergraduate thesis on the topic. He stated his desire to serve as a class representative in a sworn declaration, emphasizing that his motivation is not personal gain, but rather a commitment to the cause.
Performance Highlights at Louisville
This season, Moss has led the Cardinals to a current record of 7-1, ranking No. 14 in the AP college football poll. He has thrown for 1,929 yards, achieving 11 touchdowns and six interceptions. His performance has earned him recognition as one of the 10 finalists for the Johnny Unitas Golden Arm Award, which honors the nation’s top upperclassman college quarterback.
Settlement Implications
The House settlement aims to distribute up to $20.5 million to athletes this year, with allocations for football and basketball programs, as well as volleyball and baseball. Although specific allocations have not been disclosed, they will be determined based on “ranges” rather than fixed amounts.
Impacts of Moss’s Inclusion in the Case
- Moss’s involvement adds a significant perspective to the case, representing a high-profile athlete from a major revenue sport.
- His inclusion overlaps with other representatives, such as Grant House and Sedona Prince, from various sports, contributing to a broader dialogue about athlete compensation.
Controversies Surrounding Moss
Moss has not been without controversy. While at USC, he faced a student conduct investigation linked to allegations of harassment by his former roommate. Moss later issued a public apology, acknowledging the incident and expressing personal growth from the experience.
Additionally, Moss garnered attention for his response to a wildfire that affected his home community in Pacific Palisades, California. He criticized individuals for misusing his childhood home during relief efforts and organized a youth football camp to support disaster recovery initiatives.
Moss’s journey in the House v. NCAA case marks a significant step as college athletes continue to navigate changes in regulations and seek a fairer structure for compensation.
