A federal judge in Oregon has issued a permanent injunction preventing the Trump administration from sending National Guard troops to Portland. This decision follows ongoing protests against immigration policies, which have highlighted tensions within the city.
Federal Ruling on National Guard Deployment
U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut made the ruling, indicating that there was no significant threat that justified deploying military personnel. She specified that there was “neither a rebellion nor danger of a rebellion” in Oregon at the time of the order.
Background and Legal Actions
The matter began escalating in late September when Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth mobilized around 200 National Guard troops to Portland. This deployment was initiated at President Trump’s direction amid protests outside an immigration processing facility.
- Date of Initial Action: September 28, 2020 – Oregon officials filed a lawsuit to block the troop deployment.
- Temporary Restraining Order: October 4, 2020 – Judge Immergut issued an order to prevent National Guard deployment.
- Second Order: A day later, the judge prohibited troops from other states from being sent to Portland.
Claims and Counterclaims
Immergut criticized the Trump administration’s claims of violence in Portland. She stated that these claims were exaggerated and misrepresented the situation on the ground.
The Justice Department, however, argued that their actions were justified based on the reports of assaults against federal officers and threats to federal property. They maintain that the National Guard’s assistance was necessary to enforce laws effectively.
Ongoing Legal Proceedings
The Justice Department has appealed Judge Immergut’s decision to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. This appeal is pending, and similar legal issues are occurring in Chicago, where a judge has also barred National Guard deployment.
This story is developing, and further updates will be provided as new information emerges. El-Balad aims to keep the public informed about these significant legal and political developments.
