News-us

Judge Permanently Stops Trump from Sending National Guard to Portland

A federal judge has permanently blocked the Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon. This decision was issued by U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut on a recent Friday. It stems from a presidential decision in September to send federal troops to Portland amid protests against immigration policies.

The Deployment Controversy

In an announcement last September, President Trump stated he would deploy federal troops in response to protests outside a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility. This move followed extensive demonstrations against the administration’s immigration crackdown. The plan included federalizing 200 National Guard troops from Oregon and an additional 200 from California.

Legal Ruling

Judge Immergut’s detailed ruling, spanning 106 pages, determined that there was no evidence of “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion” in Oregon necessitating federal troop deployment. She stated, “the President [was] unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States” in this scenario.

  • The National Guard will remain under federal control for at least 14 days post-ruling.
  • This ruling marks the fourth similar decision against federal troop deployment in Oregon.
  • The evidence presented at trial included over 750 exhibits and testimony from various law enforcement officials.

Responses to the Ruling

Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security Tricia McLaughlin defended the administration’s actions, stating they were necessary to protect federal assets amidst violent protests. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson echoed this sentiment, insisting that President Trump exercised his lawful authority to maintain order.

Conversely, Oregon Governor Tina Kotek criticized the attempts to federalize the National Guard. She emphasized the state does not require military intervention and urged the Trump administration to withdraw all troops. Oregon National Guard members have already been away from their regular duties for over a month.

Background on Title 10

The use of Title 10 allows the president to mobilize National Guard troops if faced with a rebellion or invasion. In this case, Immergut argued that the President’s characterization of Portland as “war-ravaged” does not align with the facts.

The federal government, dissatisfied with the ruling, has filed an appeal with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The initial orders blocking troop deployment remain in effect while the appeal is considered. Meanwhile, the situation in Portland continues to evolve as authorities assess the peacefulness of ongoing protests near the ICE facility.

With this ruling, the focus shifts to how both state and federal authorities will address public safety and the ongoing protests in Portland.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button