The Trump administration has filed an appeal with a federal court to delay a recent ruling regarding SNAP payments. The request was submitted to the First Circuit Court of Appeals following a federal judge’s decision that mandates full funding for food stamp benefits in November.
Background of the SNAP Ruling
The emergency appeal was made on a Friday, a day after U.S. District Judge John McConnell in Rhode Island ordered the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to secure additional funds. The judge’s ruling rejected the administration’s plan to partially support the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.
Legal Arguments from the Administration
The Justice Department, representing the USDA, argued that Judge McConnell overstepped his authority. In court documents, they stated that the ruling risks prolonging the lapse in appropriations and complicating ongoing shutdown negotiations.
- “This unprecedented injunction undermines the separation of powers,” the DOJ emphasized.
- The administration argued there is no legal basis for requiring USDA to find an additional $4 billion.
Funding for SNAP Benefits
This week, the USDA allocated enough funding for states to distribute partial food stamp benefits. Judge McConnell had directed them to do so prior to his ruling.
The appeals court is asked to respond by 4 PM ET on Friday. If upheld, the ruling would enforce the requirement for full November SNAP payments while the legal proceedings continue.
Impact on Beneficiaries
States are processing SNAP payments at different rates. Some beneficiaries may receive their assistance next week, while others may face delays.
- Illinois plans to start distributing funds on Friday for those originally scheduled for earlier payments.
- Many payments are staggered throughout the month, affecting nearly 42 million Americans who rely on food stamps.
The outcome of this appeal could have significant implications for food assistance across the country.
