DOJ Considers Legal Implications of Potential Third Trump Term

Recently, legal arguments were presented in front of the Sixth Circuit Court regarding multiple issues, including the potential for President Donald Trump to serve a third term. This discussion arose following Trump’s enthusiastic remark about his desire to run again.
Legal Discussion on Future Administration Possibilities
During the virtual oral arguments, attorney Robert J. Olson addressed the court, suggesting a new administration could take place “in three years or in seven years.” This phrase was echoed by DOJ attorney Sean R. Janda, highlighting a possible shift in leadership.
Trump’s Statements on a Third Term
While flying on Air Force One, President Trump expressed his excitement about the possibility of a third term. When asked about ruling out such a bid, he stated, “I would love to do it—I have the best numbers ever.”
The U.S. Constitution limits a president to two terms, but some of Trump’s supporters are exploring potential methods to circumvent this restriction.
Context of the Legal Arguments
The references to a potential extended term occurred within the framework of a case addressing whether gun buyers with concealed-carry permits can bypass FBI background checks in Michigan. Olson argued for reconsideration of a rescinded advisory from Trump’s first term related to these background checks.
Implications of Future Administration Changes
- Olson highlighted that nothing would prevent a future administration from reinstating prior policies.
- Janda supported this view, suggesting that potential future changes would not complicate the current case.
He reiterated that should the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) reassess its policies at a future date, plaintiffs could challenge this change.
Support for Trump and Alternative Strategies
Some of Trump’s supporters have proposed unique strategies for a potential run, such as nominating him as a vice-presidential candidate with a different presidential candidate. This would allow for his subsequent elevation to the presidency upon the other candidate’s resignation. However, Trump dismissed this notion as “too cute.”
This ongoing dialogue around Trump’s potential candidacy and the implications for future administrations reflect a complex political landscape in the United States.




