A professional snooker player is embroiled in intense family drama linked to a significant benefits fraud case. Matthew Selt, a well-known snooker champion, has seen his family face serious allegations involving £200,000 worth of fraudulent claims. These claims have come to light during a contentious family court dispute initiated by his mother.
Background of the Case
Matthew Selt, ranked 43rd in the world and the 2019 Indian Open Champion, is the son of Susan Hickenbotham. His mother has accused him and his two sisters, Claire Noble and Charlotte Hamblin, of coercing her into transferring ownership of her home.
- Property Location: Romford, Essex
- Home Value: £500,000
- Years Fraud Alleged: 19 years (from 2000 to 2019)
- Total Fraudulent Claims: £200,000
The Allegations
In the Central London County Court, Susan Hickenbotham claimed that her children pressured her into signing over her house, which she had occupied since 1998. She alleges this occurred under “coercion and duress,” particularly when she was served an eviction notice.
Judge Simon Monty ruled against her claims, validating the deed that transferred the house to Claire Noble. However, the judge acknowledged that Susan had made significant contributions when the house was purchased.
The Housing Benefit Fraud
During the court proceedings, the judge uncovered that both Susan and Claire Noble were involved in a sizeable housing benefit scam. The court determined that despite the house being under Claire’s name, Susan remained the true owner until the 2019 agreement was signed. Thus, this arrangement enabled them to claim housing benefits fraudulently.
Judge Monty stated, “The tenancy was a sham aimed at deceiving local authorities to secure housing benefit payments.” He noted that the assistance in this fraudulent activity appeared to stem from the relationship between Susan and Claire.
Financial Implications
Over the years, Susan Hickenbotham claimed and received approximately £200,000 in housing benefits. This amount was reportedly used to cover mortgage payments for the home, which she was not entitled to claim due to her ownership status.
- Initial Downpayment: £7,500 by Susan in 2000
- Additional Payment: £96,000 from Susan’s father toClaire in 2008
Judge’s Final Ruling
Ultimately, the judge decided to report both Susan Hickenbotham and Claire Noble to the relevant authorities for their role in this fraud case. He emphasized the fraudulent nature of the tenancy agreement, declaring it a dishonest document meant to mislead local authorities.
This complex family feud not only exposes deep-seated issues but also highlights the importance of integrity in public benefit claims. The legal ramifications may continue as authorities address the serious allegations of benefits fraud involving multiple family members.
