Fourth Survivor Leaves Grooming Inquiry; Mahmood Vows Integrity Maintained

Concerns are rising regarding the ongoing national inquiry into grooming gangs, with four survivors now withdrawing from the process. They feel that their voices are not being prioritized and that key issues surrounding racial and religious motivations behind their abuse are being downplayed. The inquiry, announced by Sir Keir Starmer in June, aims to provide a comprehensive examination of the incidents but faces significant scrutiny.
Survivor Voices Raised
Survivors of grooming gangs claim that their experiences are being overshadowed. Kemi Badenoch, the Minister for Women and Equalities, has echoed these concerns. She emphasized that the inquiry must not become a “cover-up” for the systemic issues that led to their exploitation.
- Four survivors have left the inquiry panels, expressing dissatisfaction with the process.
- Concerns have emerged regarding the choice of potential inquiry chairs.
- Badenoch accused the government of a “briefing war” against survivors.
Inquiry Leadership and Survivor Panel
The inquiry is tasked with examining the ethnicity and religion of offenders. The government is in the process of finalizing the leadership. Annie Hudson, one potential chair, recently withdrew due to concerns about possible conflicts of interest linked to her background in social work. In contrast, Jim Gamble, a former police chief and expert in child abuse, met with survivors to discuss the inquiry.
Survivors’ Concerns
Jess, a survivor and recent panel dropout, highlighted her dismay at the potential chairs’ affiliations with professions that failed to protect them. She stated, “I was shocked and didn’t know how they could be involved.” Another survivor expressed fears that the inquiry’s focus could shift from grooming gangs to broader issues of child sexual abuse.
- Two panels are expected to include approximately 20 survivors.
- Survivors insist on a focused inquiry solely addressing grooming gangs.
Integrity of the Inquiry
Sir Keir Starmer has publicly reinforced his commitment to maintaining the integrity of the inquiry. He urged survivors to rejoin, pledging that the investigation’s scope will not be diluted. “Injustice will have no place to hide,” he asserted, emphasizing that survivor experiences are at the heart of this effort.
The inquiry’s framework is still under development, with the government close to securing a chair. Meanwhile, tensions remain high as survivors seek transparency and accountability in an inquiry that many feel is critical to addressing the injustices they have faced.