The ban on Palestine Action has led to widespread protests and legal challenges. More than 2,100 individuals have been arrested during these demonstrations, which express support for the group. Protesters have displayed signs asserting their opposition to genocide and their support for Palestine Action.
Government’s Stance on Palestine Action Ban
Since the prohibition of Palestine Action, approximately 170 protesters face legal charges for allegedly supporting the group. The charges may carry penalties of up to six months in prison. Under current terrorism laws, banned organizations can seek to overturn these bans through an intricate review process managed by the Home Office.
Legal Review Process
This review can extend over several months. If the Home Office upholds the ban, affected groups may appeal to the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a semi-secret court designed to handle such cases. This procedure typically requires banned organizations to navigate a lengthy legal battle, lasting potentially over a year.
Judicial Review of the Ban
During a recent court session, lawyers representing activist Ms. Ammori contended that the circumstances surrounding the ban were unprecedented. They argued that the significant public support for Palestine Action signaled a need for an immediate review by the High Court.
Court Ruling
Baroness Sue Carr, the Lady Chief Justice, ruled in favor of Ms. Ammori. She stated that it is lawful for her to challenge the initial decision to ban Palestine Action without waiting for the appeal outcome through the POAC. Her decision highlighted the appropriateness of a judicial review as a more efficient method for questioning the legality of the ban.
- Judicial review offers a quicker resolution compared to the deproscription application route.
- The High Court will assess the legality of the proscription order against Palestine Action.
- Ms. Ammori has obtained permission to broaden her case in November, addressing further aspects of the ban’s legality.
The judicial review decision is particularly significant as it may impact pending criminal cases against individuals arrested for their support of Palestine Action. It emphasizes the possibility of obtaining a more immediate legal resolution to the contentious ban.
