USC has formally rejected a funding proposal from the Trump administration, which aimed to influence the university’s governance through a set of conservative policies. This decision is highlighted in a recent letter from USC’s interim president, Beong-Soo Kim, directed to U.S. Department of Education Secretary Linda McMahon.
Details of the Funding Proposal
The administration’s proposal, described in a 10-point memo titled “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education,” contained various conditions. These included:
- Commitments to standardized testing
- Changes to foreign student enrollment policies
USC’s Response
In his communication, President Kim stated that he “respectfully declines” the proposal. He expressed concerns that even though participating was voluntary, it could ultimately undermine principles of free inquiry and academic excellence, which the compact purported to promote.
Other Institutions’ Reactions
USC is not alone in its decision. Three other notable universities—
- The University of Pennsylvania
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
- Brown University
—have also rejected the administration’s funding offer.
Impact on USC’s Finances
This rejection comes at a challenging time for USC, as the university is grappling with a significant budget gap of $200 million. Contributing factors include:
- Reduced federal funding
- Rising operational costs
- A high-profile sexual assault scandal that incurred over $1 billion in payouts
Faculty Support
Faculty members have expressed strong support for USC’s decision. Kate Levin, an associate professor of writing, stated that this decision reflects a collective stance from various campus groups, including the American Association of University Professors chapter. She emphasized that the rejection safeguards academic freedom, civil rights, and student safety.
Conclusion
As USC continues to navigate these challenging circumstances, its rejection of the Trump administration’s funding proposal highlights its commitment to maintaining its academic integrity. The faculty’s unified response demonstrates the importance of academic freedom and the values that guide educational institutions.
