Ben Shalom Criticizes Zuffa’s Business Practices

Ben Shalom, the promoter for Boxxer, has recently publicly criticized Zuffa’s business practices. His comments come following the acquisition of fighter Sam Hickey, whom he claims was under an existing contract. This issue has escalated to the point where Shalom is contemplating legal action against Zuffa.
Allegations Against Zuffa
Shalom expressed his frustration, stating that Zuffa seems to believe that he will not take action. He emphasized that the core of the matter lies in contractual obligations. Fighters, he insists, should not be poached while still under contract with another promoter.
Concerns Over Ethics
Shalom raised serious questions about the ethics of such actions. He noted, “You can’t just ignore that fighters are under contract and being paid by another promoter.” He highlighted previous instances where Zuffa allegedly disregarded matching rights, particularly in reference to Conor Benn and Chris Billam-Smith.
- Sam Hickey recently taken by Zuffa, according to Shalom.
- Shalom argues Zuffa has ignored contractual obligations.
- Concerns voiced over Zuffa’s impact on British boxing.
Legal Action Consideration
Shalom is resolute that he will not yield easily to Zuffa’s tactics. He affirmed, “Thankfully we live in a country where you can’t do those types of things.” This statement underscores his intent to explore legal avenues to protect his interests and those of his fighters.
Reflections on Zuffa’s Influence
Further, Shalom expressed skepticism about Zuffa’s understanding of the boxing landscape. He remarked on their chaotic approach, describing it as disruptive. “I can’t keep up [with Zuffa],” he said, calling attention to the inconsistency in their decisions regarding titles and lawsuits against governing bodies.
British Boxing Landscape
Shalom argued that British promoters have historically cared more for the sport than American conglomerates like Zuffa. This reflects wider anxieties within the British boxing community about foreign entities disrupting established norms and practices.
In conclusion, Shalom’s criticisms of Zuffa highlight significant tensions within the boxing world. As this situation unfolds, it remains to be seen whether legal action will be pursued and what implications it will have for the sport in Britain.




