A recently shared testimony by Brigadier General Alan R. Gronewold, the top military leader in Oregon, has ignited discussions online regarding the National Guard’s potential role in upcoming protests. With anticipation surrounding a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit about troop deployments, this topic has gained significant traction across social media platforms.
Oregon National Guard’s Proposed Mission
During his remarks before a Senate subcommittee, Gronewold discussed the deployment of two companies from the National Guard to Portland. He indicated that these soldiers were to undergo training in “protective crowd control.” However, this plan is now uncertain following a recent ruling by a federal judge.
Governor’s Orders and Legal Rulings
- Governor Tina Kotek ordered the troops to return home after the judge concluded that President Trump lacked the authority to mobilize them.
- The judge’s ruling paused the federal troop mobilization on Saturday, with an expanded order blocking units from any state the following day.
- Trump’s administration has appealed this decision, and the Ninth Circuit is set to conduct a hearing on the matter soon.
General Gronewold outlined the dual purpose of the National Guard’s mission: defending the nation and protecting the citizens of Oregon. He emphasized that deploying soldiers to safeguard protesters at the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in South Portland exemplifies their commitment to public safety.
Clarification on Military and Law Enforcement Roles
The general’s statement on September 30 drew both support and critique, highlighting a divide in public opinion. He clarified that if the troops are federalized, they would be removed from his authority and would operate under the U.S. Northern Command. This raised questions about the implications of Trump’s announcement to use “full force,” a term that lacks clarity in military doctrine.
In his closing remarks, Gronewold urged lawmakers to convey the distinction between the National Guard and federal law enforcement. He reassured that the Oregon-based troops are dedicated to their community, stating, “We’re the home team, and our job is to protect and serve Oregonians.”
Military Community Sentiment
Gronewold addressed the National Guard members directly in a letter dated September 29. He acknowledged their potential reservations regarding the mission. He reminded them that they are both citizens and service members bound by an oath to uphold the Constitution and follow lawful orders. This message reinforces the strength of their commitment to duty amid a politically charged environment.
As the situation unfolds, the role of the National Guard in Oregon’s upcoming protests remains to be seen. Stakeholders await the appellate court’s decision, which will be critical in guiding the state’s next steps.
