A former neurologist from Kitchener, Ontario, Jeffrey Sloka, has been acquitted of 48 sexual assault charges. The decision, delivered by Justice Craig Parry, came after a lengthy trial that began nearly five years ago. Sloka’s license was revoked in 2019 by the Ontario college representing doctors, following allegations that date back to 2010.
Details of the Trial and Verdict
Justice Parry prepared an extensive 1,002-page ruling document. However, he succinctly summarized the main points before a crowded courtroom filled with family and supporters of both Sloka and his former patients. He stated that there was insufficient evidence to prove that Sloka had manipulated medical examinations to exploit his patients.
- Sloka adequately proposed and explained the examinations he performed.
- The Crown failed to demonstrate misconduct on each charge.
- Each witness was found to have provided unreliable testimony to varying degrees.
Background of the Allegations
The allegations against Sloka became public in 2017, with patients accusing him of inappropriate conduct during medical assessments. He treated various conditions, including migraines and head injuries. During the trial, witnesses described incidents where he asked them to undress for examinations such as breast and pelvic checks.
Sloka took the stand in his defense, claiming either that the allegations were false or that there was justification for his actions. Initially, he faced 76 charges, but several were dropped upon the Crown’s request.
Reactions to the Verdict
Upon the announcement of the not guilty verdict, reactions were immediate and intense. Supporters for the complainants expressed their disappointment vocally, with some shouting “shame” in the courthouse. Outside the building, groups gathered to show solidarity with the former patients of Sloka, holding signs and expressing their feelings about the ruling.
In contrast, Sloka’s lawyer emphasized that the neurologist sought a fair trial throughout the proceedings. The lawyer also noted Sloka’s gratitude towards those who supported him during the trial.
