California Governor Gavin Newsom has called on the University of Southern California (USC) to uphold academic freedom in light of a controversial higher education compact proposed by former President Donald Trump. The compact, presented to USC and eight other universities, suggests policy changes in exchange for favorable federal funding.
Newsom’s Firm Stance Against Trump’s Campus Compact
On Friday, during a bill signing event at UC Berkeley, Newsom addressed the compact, urging USC to reject it. He emphasized the importance of academic freedom, stating, “What’s the point of the system if we don’t have academic freedom?” His remarks came as he expressed concern over a potential shift in campus policies towards more conservative views.
Details of the Trump Compact
The compact outlines a requirement for participating universities to align with Trump’s perspectives on various issues, including:
- Admissions and diversity policies
- Free speech initiatives
- Gender identity definitions
- Foreign student enrollment restrictions
In exchange for compliance, schools would gain better access to federal research grants and other financial benefits. Schools would also need to reassess practices that restrict conservative speech on campuses.
Impact on USC and State Funding
USC’s interim President Beong-Soo Kim acknowledged receiving the offer and plans to engage with various stakeholders for a thorough discussion. He stated, “These conversations can take time, but they are essential to building trust and community.”
Meanwhile, Newsom warned that universities accepting the terms of the compact could face significant financial consequences, including the potential loss of billions in state funding. He specifically mentioned Cal Grants, California’s primary financial aid program, which distributed $2.5 billion statewide in the 2024-25 academic year.
UC System Response to Federal Proposals
While Newsom focused on USC, he expressed confidence in the University of California (UC) system, which is currently engaged in negotiations with the Trump administration related to various issues, including antisemitism investigations. Newsom reminded that the UC system should adhere to its values while navigating these federal discussions.
Conclusion: Academic Freedom at Risk
Analysts have noted the particularly difficult position USC finds itself in regarding the compact. With significant funding potentially at stake, university leaders face a dilemma: comply with federal demands or uphold their commitment to academic independence. Newsom’s challenge to USC signifies a broader discussion on the preservation of academic freedom in higher education.
As the situation unfolds, the implications of this compact for higher education institutions across the nation remain to be seen.
