Judges have confirmed the dismissal of the terrorism case against Kneecap member Liam Og O hAnnaidh, known by his stage name Mo Chara. The decision comes after the High Court rejected an appeal from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).
Case Background and Charges
The controversy began in May 2025 when O hAnnaidh was charged with allegedly displaying a flag supporting the designated terrorist group Hezbollah. This incident reportedly occurred during a performance in London on November 21, 2024.
Dismissal of Charges
Last September, the case was dismissed on technical grounds. Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring declared the charge “unlawful,” stating he had no jurisdiction over it. Following the dismissal, prosecutors sought to appeal the decision.
High Court Ruling
The High Court ruling was issued remotely on Wednesday afternoon, with Lord Justice Edis and Mr. Justice Linden presiding. Edis confirmed that the initial judge properly determined he lacked jurisdiction to address the alleged offence on that date.
Legal Considerations
In their ruling, the judges emphasized that the case’s dismissal was strictly related to a narrow legal issue. It did not address whether O hAnnaidh committed the alleged offence.
Statements from O hAnnaidh
After the ruling, O hAnnaidh criticized the use of the term “terrorism” by the British government. He stated this case was not about him but about broader issues, particularly relating to Palestine.
- “This entire process was never about me,” he remarked.
- He expressed concern for families affected in Gaza and reiterated that their message would continue to focus on Palestine.
Impact on Kneecap
The rapper highlighted the struggles his band faced due to the ongoing legal situation. Despite losing gigs and facing restrictions, he emphasized their commitment to using their platform for advocacy.
Response from the Crown Prosecution Service
A CPS spokesperson stated that the High Court’s decision provides clarity regarding how written charges are issued in cases where the attorney general’s permission is required. They indicated a commitment to updating their processes in light of this ruling.
Future Proceedings
O hAnnaidh initially appeared in court for the charges in June, with subsequent hearings leading to the significant legal arguments about jurisdiction and the need for prior approval from the attorney general.
The ruling marks a definitive conclusion to this high-profile case within the context of legal challenges surrounding freedom of expression and protest in the UK.
