B62 Studios, headed by Aditya Dhar, now finds itself navigating a precarious legal landscape following allegations of multiple infractions during the filming of ‘Dhurandhar 2’. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has levied serious accusations, suggesting improper handling of flammable materials and unauthorized generator vans. This precarious situation has culminated in a proposed fine of Rs 1 lakh and the forfeiture of the studio’s Rs 25,000 security deposit. As excitement builds for the film’s release in March, these developments could overshadow its premiere.
BMC to Blacklist Aditya Dhar’s Production House?
The discontent brewing within the BMC is palpable. According to a report from El-Balad, the A ward office has moved to formally request the Deputy Municipal Commissioner to permanently blacklist B62 Studios from obtaining future filming permits. This marks a tactical maneuver by the BMC, a signal that it won’t tolerate violations of its regulations. By proposing a fine and seeking a blacklist, the civic body appears keen on establishing a precedent aimed at discouraging future infractions from the burgeoning film industry.
A Closer Look at the Allegations
On January 30, the BMC granted permission for filming between Modi Street and Perin Nariman Street, specifically designed for February 7 and 8. However, the rules banning the use of fireworks and dangerous materials were reportedly breached by the film crew. Following complaints, an application for subsequent shooting days on February 13 and 14 was denied. Despite obtaining conditional permission again, the misuse of flammable materials came to light on February 14, leading to swift BMC action—including the seizure of lit torches on set.
| Stakeholder | Before Incident | After Incident |
|---|---|---|
| B62 Studios | Operational permits, security deposit intact, project momentum | Blacklisting possibility, financial penalty, public relations crisis |
| BMC | Perceived as lenient with regulations, oversight responsibilities | Strengthened authority, potential backlash from the film community |
| Film Community | Thriving industry environment, supportive government relationships | Heightened scrutiny, fear of stricter regulations and blacklisting |
Hidden Motivations and Strategic Goals
The BMC’s actions reflect a deeper tension between regulatory enforcement and the creative freedoms that filmmakers typically seek. The decision to blacklist B62 Studios aligns with an overarching strategy to mitigate risks associated with dangerous practices on set, especially in densely populated urban areas like Mumbai. By imposing penalties, the BMC is asserting its commitment to public safety, serving as a tactical hedge against potential disasters that could arise from negligence.
The Ripple Effect Beyond Mumbai
This regulatory scrutiny resonates globally, echoing across the US, UK, Canada, and Australia, where film productions face similar oversight challenges. In these regions, production companies are often burdened by strict regulations regarding safety and environmental concerns. As filmmakers worldwide increasingly contend with regulatory bodies, the BMC’s stance could spark discussions within international film circles about safety standards and operational transparency.
Projected Outcomes
As the situation continues to evolve, here are three key developments to monitor in the coming weeks:
- Legal Responses: B62 Studios may contest the BMC’s decision, leading to potential legal battles that could further delay filming schedules.
- Public Relations Strategy: The studio will likely launch a campaign to restore public confidence and salvage its reputation prior to the film’s release.
- Regulatory Repercussions: This incident may prompt the BMC to reevaluate and tighten its production permitting processes, affecting future film shoots across Mumbai.
In conclusion, while the anticipation for ‘Dhurandhar 2’ remains high, the consequences of regulatory breaches could cast a long shadow over both the film’s release and future projects from B62 Studios. The industry will be watching closely, as this incident could set a critical precedent for how films are produced in urban environments.
