The recent Superliga match between Hermannstadt and CFR Cluj showcased the critical role of VAR technology in officiating. The game, which took place as part of the 27th round of the season, became eventful just before halftime.
Key Moments from Hermannstadt vs. CFR Cluj
- Date: February 16, 2026
- Location: Sibiu, Romania
- Final Score: 0-0
Penalty Controversy
During the first half, with the score still at 0-0, Hermannstadt was awarded a penalty following a questionable challenge by CFR Cluj’s Keita on Florescu. Initially, referee Andrei Chivulete did not call for a penalty. However, VAR official Ovidiu Hațegan instructed him to review the incident.
After a brief consultation with the VAR, Chivulete decided to award a penalty to Hermannstadt. This gave the home team a significant opportunity to take the lead just before halftime.
Missed Opportunity
Eduard Florescu, who earned the penalty, stepped up but poorly executed his shot, hitting it directly at goalkeeper Mihai Popa. The missed penalty meant that the teams went into the break level at 0-0.
Further VAR Interventions
The intensity of the match continued even after the penalty miss. There were doubts raised regarding early encroachments into the box by players Politic and Djokovic during the penalty kick. After another review from the VAR, the decision was made not to retake the penalty.
Chivulete concluded the first half, with both teams showing their determination but no goals to show for it.
This match highlighted how VAR can impact key decisions in football, raising questions about refereeing in crucial moments. Hermannstadt and CFR Cluj will look to capitalize on this game in their upcoming fixtures as they continue their campaigns in the league.
