Mark Clattenburg, a former FIFA referee, analyzed two controversial penalty incidents involving Reo Hatate during a recent match between Celtic and Livingston. The first incident occurred when Hatate fouled Livingston’s Robbie Muirhead in the Celtic penalty area, resulting in a penalty for the visitors. The second incident involved a late-game handball claim against Hatate, which sparked protests from Livingston players.
Analysis of Reo Hatate’s Penalty Incidents
Clattenburg addressed both incidents, emphasizing the significance of accurate decision-making in football. His insights shed light on the complexities of refereeing in high-stakes matches.
First Incident: Foul on Robbie Muirhead
- Hatate fouled Muirhead by kicking his leg while attempting to defend a cross.
- Clattenburg affirmed it was a clear penalty, noting the absence of protests from players.
He stated, “The ball comes towards Reo Hatate of Celtic after a cross inside the penalty area. Muirhead got ahead of him and was kicked, warranting a penalty.”
Second Incident: Late Handball Claim
- In the dying moments, Livingston appealed for a handball against Hatate in the penalty area.
- Clattenburg rejected this claim, citing Hatate’s arms were in a natural position.
He explained, “The ball touched Hatate’s arm, but it was not a penalty since he did not make a movement towards the ball.”
Implications for Reo Hatate
Although the penalty decisions did not result in adverse consequences for Celtic, Reo Hatate’s performance has raised concerns. His form has been lackluster this season, putting both his position in the Celtic team and his chances of participating in the World Cup with Japan at risk.
- Struggling for consistency this season.
- Potential risks to his World Cup hopes if his performance does not improve.
As Celtic continues its campaign in the Scottish Premiership, the focus will be on how Hatate rebounds from these pressures and penalties.
