Georgian leaders have condemned the activation of the OSCE Moscow Mechanism by 24 participating states. They view this action as a politically charged initiative aimed at targeting their country. The mechanism was activated on January 29, 2024, and allows an independent mission to investigate alleged human rights violations in Georgia since spring 2024.
Concerns About Human Rights and Government Response
The UK Foreign Office indicated that this move stemmed from concerns over Georgia’s adherence to its OSCE obligations and international human rights standards. Georgian Parliament Speaker Shalva Papuashvili criticized the mechanism as a method of pressure against Georgia. He accused international partners, primarily those in Brussels, of hindering dialogue with Tbilisi.
- Papuashvili emphasized Georgia’s openness to discussions, stating that the government has nothing to hide.
- He refuted any allegations regarding the use of chemical weapons in the country, calling them misleading.
- Papuashvili pointed to political bias from Poland, the initiative’s leader, due to its previous support of former President Mikheil Saakashvili.
Parliamentary Majority Leader’s Criticism
On February 3, parliamentary majority leader Irakli Kirtskhalia echoed these sentiments during a session. He characterized the OSCE’s activation as an instance of foreign interference in Georgia’s internal matters. Kirtskhalia specifically targeted Sweden, which he accused of hypocrisy amidst its own domestic issues.
- Kirtskhalia highlighted Sweden’s rising crime rates and economic challenges.
- He argued that Sweden should focus on its internal problems rather than fabricating issues in Georgia.
- He criticized Sweden for awarding a Freedom Prize to Georgian protesters, which he deemed an inappropriate act of interference.
Swedish Reactions and Historical Cooperation
Swedish MP Gustaf Göthberg dismissed Kirtskhalia’s assertions, labeling them as baseless. He noted Sweden’s ongoing reforms and contrasted its democratic practices with Georgia’s alleged repression of protests. Historically, Sweden has supported Georgia but has paused cooperation following the contentious 2024 parliamentary elections.
Officials noted that collaboration could resume if Georgia reinstates its EU integration efforts.
International Implications of the Moscow Mechanism
Elene Khoshtaria, from the Coalition for Change, called the Moscow Mechanism’s activation a significant warning to the ruling Georgian Dream party. She associated it with underlying concerns regarding the government’s alleged use of chemical agents during protest crackdowns.
This activation follows the Vienna Mechanism’s earlier introduction by 38 states, which also sought to address human rights issues in Georgia. The OSCE is now urging Georgian authorities to actively engage with the independent expert mission, positioning it as a chance for proving commitment to constructive dialogue.
