Cavaliers, NBA Review Raised Court Design Following Luka Dončić’s Injury

The NBA and the Cleveland Cavaliers are set to reevaluate the court design at Rocket Arena following a recent injury scare involving Luka Dončić of the Los Angeles Lakers. The raised court, which stands about 10 inches above the rubber mat that covers the hockey rink beneath, has come under scrutiny after Dončić narrowly avoided a serious injury during a game.
Concerns Over Court Safety
On Wednesday night, Dončić experienced left ankle soreness after he fell off the court’s elevated edge. This incident raised alarms about player safety, prompting the Cavaliers and the NBA to revisit the court design.
Previous Incidents
- The Cavs’ unique raised court design has been in place for over 20 years.
- This is not the first injury linked to the gap; Miami Heat player Dru Smith also suffered a significant knee injury last November.
- Despite the raised court being operational for 31 years, there have been very few notable injuries.
Following the incident with Dončić, the Lakers lodged a formal complaint, marking the second such complaint about this court design. Heat coach Erik Spoelstra, along with Lakers coach JJ Redick, expressed their concerns, categorizing the design as a “safety hazard.” LeBron James, a former Cavalier, suggested that modifications are necessary given the potential risks associated with the layout.
League Evaluation and Player Safety
The National Basketball Players Association has consistently raised issues regarding player safety linked to the raised court. In light of recent events, the association is engaged in talks with the NBA to address what many consider a serious safety concern.
In an official statement, the Cavaliers maintained that their court design complies with NBA regulations and has undergone regular evaluations by independent flooring experts. However, this situation has opened discussions on possible enhancements to player safety without compromising the fan experience.
Future Modifications
The design challenges related to the elevated court may complicate any immediate modifications. Potential options under consideration include:
- Reducing the size of the wooden structures upon which the court sits.
- Implementing rubber ramps at the edges to minimize the drop.
- Possibly moving the court to a lower level, addressing ice condensation issues.
Each solution carries its own set of complications. Adjusting the court during the ongoing season may pose logistical challenges, particularly as the Cavaliers aim for playoff success.
Conclusion
The discussions between the NBA and the Cavaliers are crucial as they seek to ensure a safe playing environment for athletes. With the Cavaliers having one of the most unique court designs in the league, balancing safety with player performance remains a priority moving forward.



