Understanding ‘The Strangers’ Case’: Key Insights and Analysis

In 1517, London witnessed a significant event known as “Evil May Day.” A riot erupted over the growing presence of immigrants. This uprising is a poignant reminder of ongoing societal tensions related to immigration.
Understanding ‘The Strangers’ Case’
The riot occurred on May 1, 1517, fueled by xenophobic sentiments. A preacher, Dr. Bell, delivered an incendiary speech that sparked public outrage. He claimed that immigrants were stealing jobs from English workers and depriving vulnerable families of their livelihoods.
Key Figures and Events
- Thomas More: A young lawyer sent to quell the riot.
- Dr. Bell: The preacher who incited the crowd with his xenophobic rhetoric.
- John Lincoln: A broker who instigated Dr. Bell’s inflammatory speech.
- Date of the Riot: May 1, 1517.
The Nature of the Rioters’ Grievances
The mob’s primary complaint centered around the “strangers” they believed threatened their livelihood. They demanded that these newcomers be expelled from London. Authorities, represented by Thomas More, sought to restore order through legal means and appeals to humanity.
The Context of the Speech
Shakespeare’s text, performed by Sir Ian McKellen, powerfully encapsulates the emotions of this turmoil. More’s speech implores the crowd to consider the humanity of the immigrants:
“Grant them removed… you had taught how insolence and strong hand should prevail… What had you got?”
This rhetoric highlights the cyclical nature of hostility towards immigrants, urging audiences to reflect on the implications of their actions.
Concluding Insights
The themes presented in the events of Evil May Day remain relevant today. The historical context serves as a reminder of the longstanding issues surrounding immigration and societal response.
For contemporary viewers, McKellen’s performance adds depth to this historical narrative. His interpretation invites reflection on the ongoing struggles surrounding the treatment of strangers in society.
Understanding ‘The Strangers’ Case’ encourages an examination of empathy and the consequences of division, ideals that resonate through centuries. As dialogues about immigration continue, revisiting our past can foster a better future.


