Rittenhouse’s Comments on Pretti Shooting, Protests Ignite Outrage in Minneapolis
Kyle Rittenhouse, known for his involvement in a controversial shooting during protests in 2020, has sparked renewed outrage with his recent comments about the shooting of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis. His social media posts have drawn significant backlash from local residents and social media users.
Reactions to Rittenhouse’s Comments
Rittenhouse’s remarks followed the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by Border Patrol agents. According to reports, Pretti allegedly approached federal agents with a firearm. Rittenhouse took to Instagram, suggesting a “how to stay alive” guide, advising not to draw weapons on federal agents. This comment has been interpreted as insensitive by many.
Community Outrage
- One social media user referred to an incident involving another individual attacked during Minneapolis protests.
- Another critic noted the contrast between Rittenhouse’s defense and the perceptions of Pretti’s actions, questioning the justice system.
- A third commenter highlighted the public’s mixed reactions to both cases, pointing to inconsistencies in societal responses.
This commentary from Rittenhouse comes just after he shared an AI-generated image depicting himself armed in a setting resembling Minneapolis, further inflaming tensions.
The Context of Rittenhouse’s Previous Case
The events surrounding Kyle Rittenhouse trace back to August 25, 2020, in Kenosha, Wisconsin. During protests prompted by the police shooting of Jacob Blake, Rittenhouse, then 17, traveled from Illinois armed with an AR-15-style rifle. In confrontations that night, he shot three men, resulting in two fatalities and one injury.
After a widely publicized trial, Rittenhouse was acquitted of all charges in November 2021. The jury found that his actions amounted to lawful self-defense under Wisconsin law.
Continuing Impact on Minneapolis Protests
The ongoing fallout from both Rittenhouse’s original incident and the recent shooting of Pretti highlights the complexities and tensions surrounding protests in the United States. Public sentiment remains divided, further exacerbating discussions on self-defense laws and justice for individuals involved in confrontational scenarios at protests.
Rittenhouse’s actions and comments serve as a focal point for discussions about gun rights, law enforcement conduct, and the broader implications of activism and protest in America today.




