The “Board of Peace,” an initiative launched by US President Donald Trump, recently gained significant global attention following its charter signing at the World Economic Forum in Davos. This new entity aims to facilitate resolution of international conflicts, particularly concerning the Palestinian people.
Trump Signs Charter for Board of Peace
On January 22, 2026, President Trump officially signed the founding charter of the Board of Peace in Davos. According to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, the charter is now fully operational, and the Board of Peace is designated as an official international organization.
Goals of the Board of Peace
During the signing ceremony, Trump stated that the Board of Peace has the potential to become one of the most influential organizations in history. He emphasized that the board will collaborate closely with the United Nations. A major focus of the organization is the disarmament of Hamas and the reconstruction of Gaza. Trump declared, “Hamas must disarm, or it will be the end of them.” He expressed commitment to a demilitarized and revitalized Gaza.
Funding and Global Participation
At the heart of the board’s initiative is a $1 billion price tag for permanent membership. Notably, Russian President Vladimir Putin has indicated Russia’s willingness to contribute $1 billion from frozen assets in the US to support the Palestinian cause through this initiative. However, this commitment is still under consideration by the Russian government.
Countries Joining the Initiative
- Countries such as Qatar, Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates have accepted invitations to join the Board of Peace.
- Not all nations have embraced the initiative, with France, Norway, Sweden, and Slovenia expressing concerns over its implications on international governance.
- Leaders like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hungary’s Viktor Orban have been invited as well.
International Response and Concerns
While Trump promotes the Board of Peace as a solution for international conflict, some leaders have voiced apprehensions. For instance, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz warned against a “world where only power counts,” highlighting the dangerous implications of such a reality.
Despite the enthusiasm from certain nations, others view the board’s broad mandate as potentially undermining the established international order represented by the United Nations. Slovenia’s leadership expressed concerns about the board’s scope and its effects on global governance.
Future Prospects for the Board of Peace
The coming days will be critical for the Board of Peace as the initiative garners varied responses from the international community. With participating countries reaffirming their commitment to the objectives, the true test will be in translating ideals into effective actions for peace and reconstruction in conflict-affected regions.
