The Justice Department has reached out to Democratic Rep. Jason Crow regarding a video urging U.S. service members to refuse illegal orders. This communication signals intensified efforts by the Trump administration against Democratic lawmakers. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, led by Jeanine Pirro, has expressed interest in interviewing Crow about the video, which was released in November 2025.
Details of the Controversial Video
The 90-second video features Crow and five other lawmakers, all of whom have military or intelligence backgrounds. They called on military personnel to reject unlawful commands. This message has prompted swift denunciation from President Trump, who labeled it as “seditious behavior” that could incur severe consequences.
Political Repercussions
Crow, a former Army Ranger, stated that Trump’s administration is using the Justice Department as a tool to intimidate political opponents. During an appearance on CBS News, Crow expressed his determination to uphold his constitutional duties. “We will do our duty,” he affirmed, vowing to resist any attempts to silence dissent.
- Other lawmakers featured in the video:
- Sen. Elissa Slotkin (Michigan)
- Sen. Mark Kelly (Arizona)
- Rep. Chris Deluzio (Pennsylvania)
- Rep. Maggie Goodlander (New Hampshire)
- Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (Pennsylvania)
Escalating Scrutiny and Legal Action
As a result of the video, both Crow and his colleagues have come under increased scrutiny. Slotkin mentioned that Jeanine Pirro sought to interview her as well. She criticized the administration’s tactics, suggesting that factual truth no longer holds value under Trump’s leadership.
Furthermore, the Pentagon has initiated a review of misconduct allegations against Sen. Mark Kelly. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently announced proceedings that could diminish Kelly’s retired status and pay. In response, Kelly has filed a civil lawsuit against Hegseth and the Defense Department, claiming retaliation against his First Amendment rights.
The ongoing situation illustrates the fraught political landscape and the use of governmental resources for political purposes. As events unfold, the implications for lawmakers like Crow and Kelly remain significant as they advocate for accountability and legislative integrity.
