A recent tribunal has made significant determinations regarding the actions of a solicitor and her former paralegal. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal has acquitted solicitor Joanne Tappin of any wrongdoing while barring former paralegal Ria Lakhani for her involvement in sending misleading emails.
Background of the Case
The tribunal’s hearings took place over seven days in November. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) initiated the proceedings, focusing on two specific emails that misrepresented the status of conveyancing transactions involving Lakhani and Tappin.
Misleading Emails and Allegations
- Ria Lakhani, employed by Makrell Solicitors, drafted the misleading communications.
- She stated that she acted under Tappin’s supervision while conveying incorrect information about missing documents.
- Tappin, accredited as a solicitor since 2012, denied authorizing any of the misleading content.
Initially, the SRA sought to withdraw allegations of dishonesty against Tappin, which the tribunal permitted. Midway through the hearing, Lakhani withdrew, citing overwhelming stress and an inability to defend herself adequately.
Tribunal Findings
During the hearings, the tribunal evaluated various communications between Lakhani and Tappin. While Lakhani claimed her emails were composed with Tappin’s guidance, Tappin clarified that she never supported sending such misleading information. She emphasized that Lakhani had acted against her instructions.
Outcomes and Consequences
The tribunal concluded that there was insufficient evidence to connect Tappin to the misleading emails. They described Lakhani’s emails as “disquieting” but ultimately inconclusive regarding Tappin’s involvement. In stark contrast, Lakhani was found to have knowingly sent misleading information to cover up errors.
- Lakhani received an indefinite section order, barring her from working at any law firm without SRA authorization.
- She was also ordered to pay £4,500 in costs.
- Tappin, now working with another firm, was directed to pay £10,000 in costs.
This case underscores the ramifications of professional misconduct and the responsibilities held by solicitors and their paralegals. The tribunal’s clear distinction between Tappin’s actions and Lakhani’s misconduct illustrates the importance of ethical standards in legal practice.
