Keith Hackett, former head of PGMOL, has criticized referee Darren England for his handling of a controversial incident featuring Amadou Onana during the match between Aston Villa and Arsenal. The incident occurred in the 10th minute at the Emirates Stadium, where Onana fell after a challenge from William Saliba.
Onana’s Actions Under Scrutiny
Hackett argues that Onana should have been penalized for simulation instead of the referee awarding a corner to Aston Villa. He insists that Onana’s fall was a deliberate attempt to deceive the officials, emphasizing that his body mechanics clearly indicated it was a dive.
Key Statements from Hackett
- Hackett stated that Onana’s actions represented an act of simulation.
- He advocated for a yellow card to be issued for such behavior to deter future incidents.
Despite his criticisms, Hackett acknowledged Onana’s recent form and contributions to the team. He stressed that while Villa’s tactics were effective in managing Arsenal’s attack, Onana’s theatrics could undermine their efforts.
Impact on the Match
Aston Villa was able to challenge Arsenal effectively during their encounter, maintaining pressure in midfield and preventing the Gunners from scoring early. However, Hackett pointed out that Onana’s fall could have changed the match’s dynamics had a penalty been awarded.
Villa’s Strategy Against Arsenal
Throughout the match, Villa’s strategy focused on frustrating Arsenal’s gameplay. Hackett noted that Onana’s behavior might have irritated Arsenal players, potentially providing Villa with a competitive edge.
Ultimately, Onana escaped without a booking and retains the opportunity to contribute further in the match. This situation has sparked discussions about the necessity of strict officiating to curb simulation in football.
Aston Villa aims to leverage these tactical approaches as they seek to enhance their standing in the league and solidify their title contention. Fans can follow El-Balad for more updates and insights into Aston Villa’s performance.
