Manitoba Domestic Violence Case Stalled by Supreme Court Time Limit

A recent case in Manitoba has highlighted significant issues within the provincial court system, particularly concerning domestic violence cases. A judge stayed charges against a man accused of domestic violence, citing excessive delays in the judicial process. The decision raises concerns about the efficiency of the courts and the systemic limitations affecting timely trials.
Details of the Domestic Violence Case
The defendant was arrested in 2023 and faced multiple charges, including two counts of assault and five additional charges, some involving a weapon. Originally set for trial in February, the proceedings were postponed due to the absence of a key witness.
Judicial Comments and Delays
Provincial court Judge David Ireland noted that nearly one and a half years elapsed between the witness’s initial allegations and her sworn statement. He attributed some delays to judicial scheduling issues, but also acknowledged that systemic court limitations contributed to the lengthy process. Judge Ireland indicated that the case exceeded the Jordan limits, which dictate that trials must occur within a reasonable timeframe.
Understanding the Jordan Limits
The Supreme Court established, in its 2016 Jordan ruling, a “presumptive ceiling” of 18 months for provincial court trials. If this limit is exceeded, defendants may have their charges stayed unless the Crown can demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying the delay.
Statistical Overview
- Manitoba has stayed 15 cases due to the Jordan limits since the ruling.
- Of these, 11 cases were stayed within the past five years.
- In the 2023-24 period alone, 1,656 adult criminal cases exceeded the Jordan limit in Manitoba.
- 704 of these cases were either stayed, withdrawn, or dismissed after surpassing the 18-month timeframe.
Concerns from Legal Experts
Michael Desautels, president of the Manitoba Association of Crown Attorneys, expressed that increasing complexity within cases, including electronic evidence, demands more court time. He urged the government to enhance resources by hiring additional Crown attorneys.
Chris Gamby, representing the Criminal Defence Lawyers Association of Manitoba, emphasized the ethical responsibilities of prosecutors in deciding whether to proceed with cases, especially when delays occur. He acknowledged public concern over delays but also pointed out the struggles of defendants awaiting their trials.
Government Response and Initiatives
Justice Minister Matt Wiebe noted that the NDP government has made efforts to improve court efficiency. This includes hiring 35 additional prosecutors and reducing court clerk vacancies in Winnipeg. He asserted that timely trials are a priority and highlighted the province’s performance concerning the number of cases stayed under the Jordan limits compared to other regions.
Continued discourse on enhancing the judicial system in Manitoba indicates a pressing need for reform. The complexities of domestic violence cases and systematic delays pose significant challenges that require immediate attention to safeguard justice for all parties involved.



