A contentious legal battle has emerged involving Lonan O’Herlihy, a reality star known from the series *Made in Chelsea*, and his ex-stepfather’s new wife, Jennifer Taylor, over a £38 million estate. This dispute follows the death of Hugh Taylor in 2019, who had originally left his fortune to Jennifer in his 2015 will.
Background of the Case
Lonan O’Herlihy, often referred to as the “Posh PT,” is seeking £5 million from Hugh Taylor’s estate. He argues that Hugh, who acted as a father figure during his upbringing, had a responsibility towards him even after his parents separated in 2003.
Details of the Estate
- Total value of the estate: £38 million
- Included assets: Classic cars, luxury properties, and a Second World War era Hawker Hurricane aircraft
- Amount Lonan seeks: £5 million
Relationship Dynamics
Lonan claims he was financially supported by Hugh until he was around 23 years old. He received extravagant birthday gifts, including a £5,000 watch and a £40,000 Audi. However, after Hugh married Jennifer in 2010, Lonan claims he was gradually excluded from Hugh’s life and was even barred from attending his funeral.
Accusations of “Greed”
Jennifer’s legal representative, Richard Wilson KC, has accused Lonan of presenting a “wish list of greed.” This list allegedly includes requests such as:
- A £3 million home in South Kensington
- A 1969-70 Mercedes 280SL Pagoda valued at £250,000
- A luxury watch
- £800,000 for an investment property
Wilson argued that Lonan’s demands do not align with reasonable financial provisions for maintenance. He emphasized Lonan’s stable earnings of approximately £70,000 per year, which he believes negates the need for such a large sum.
The Legal Argument
Lonan’s lawyer, Hugh Jeffery, contends that Hugh had undertaken parental responsibility, providing consistent financial support until Lonan was an adult. Jeffery noted the stark contrast between Lonan’s expected lifestyle and his current financial challenges, highlighting debts over £150,000 and a lack of capital assets.
Future Proceedings
As the case continues, the court must weigh Lonan’s assertion of entitlement against Hugh’s intentions as expressed in his will. The upcoming hearings will examine the validity of Lonan’s claims under the 1975 Inheritance Act, with both parties confronting significant differences in narrative regarding their familial relationship.
The proceedings are marked by hostility, and it remains to be seen how the court will interpret these dynamics in light of Hugh’s last wishes.
