New Orleans has pioneered the integration of live facial recognition technology into public safety measures. This initiative, led by the non-profit organization Project NOLA, represents a shift in how surveillance technologies are utilized in urban settings. Established in 2009 by former police officer Bryan Lagarde, Project NOLA operates an extensive network of crime cameras that spans the city.
Project NOLA’s Surveillance Network
Project NOLA currently monitors over 5,000 cameras situated on private properties, supported by contributions from “volunteer” participants. The non-profit has introduced live facial recognition capabilities to approximately 200 of its most advanced cameras, enabling real-time tracking of individuals in public spaces like the French Quarter.
How the System Works
- The cameras actively search for faces from a database of about 250 individuals on a “hot list.”
- Alerts are automatically generated when a match occurs, notifying Project NOLA staff.
- Data on suspicious activity, including weapon possession and gang involvement, is shared with law enforcement as needed.
Legal Challenges and Political Implications
Despite its potential benefits, the collaboration between Project NOLA and the New Orleans Police Department (NOPD) faced legal scrutiny. The local ordinance, which permits the use of facial recognition, does not specifically authorize real-time data sharing from private entities like Project NOLA. This was brought to light following a Washington Post article published in May, prompting NOPD Superintendent Anne Kirkpatrick to pause live alerts to officers until legal clarifications are made.
Privacy and Accountability Concerns
Experts and advocates express concerns over privacy implications and the governance of surveillance technologies. Ryan Calo, a law professor at the University of Washington, argues that surveillance conducted by private organizations could undermine legal protections typically afforded to individuals. Conversely, Lagarde from Project NOLA asserts that his organization maintains strict privacy measures and aims for greater accountability than government-run systems.
The Community’s Perspective
In New Orleans, opinions about live facial recognition technology are mixed among residents. Some, like Zac Shoulders, express unease about surveillance practices under private control, wishing for more public oversight. On the contrary, local business owners like Tim Blake, who has embraced Project NOLA’s cameras, advocate for the safety benefits they provide. Many believe that increased surveillance could deter criminal activity and enhance community safety.
As discussions around policing practices evolve, New Orleans stands at the forefront of a significant debate on the role of private organizations in public safety. The city’s unique experience with live facial recognition technology may set a precedent for other urban areas grappling with similar challenges.
