News-us

Colorado Condemns Trump’s Pardon of Jailed County Clerk as ‘Lawless’

Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, currently serving a nine-year prison sentence, has received a pardon from former President Donald Trump. This decision has sparked significant controversy among Colorado state officials who have called it “lawless.” The pardon announcement was made via Trump’s social media platform, Truth Social.

Background on Tina Peters and Her Conviction

Tina Peters was convicted for tampering with election equipment in her county. Her actions included unauthorized access to voting machines, which she claimed were her attempts to expose voter fraud. Peters has been a prominent figure in the 2020 election denial movement, continually asserting that the election was rigged.

Trump’s Pardon Announcement

  • Trump announced the pardon on Thursday, citing Peters’ desire to ensure fair elections.
  • His post reiterated false claims regarding the 2020 presidential election.
  • It remains unclear on what grounds the pardon was issued, as Peters was convicted in a state court.

Responses from Colorado Officials

Colorado’s Governor, Jared Polis, expressed strong opposition to the pardon. He stated that Peters was convicted by a jury and a Republican District Attorney. He emphasized that no president has jurisdiction over state law.

Attorney General Phil Weiser also criticized Trump’s decision, labeling it a “lawless act.” He remarked that the move undermines state authority in managing criminal justice and reflects a lack of respect for the rule of law. Weiser commented, “Our system of government gives states authority to run their own criminal justice systems.”

Implications of the Pardon

The pardon raises questions about the limits of presidential authority regarding state convictions. While presidential pardons are typically reserved for federal offenses, Trump’s action is seen as an overreach. Colorado officials are adamant that this act does not hold legal ground.

The situation remains fluid, as Trump’s administration and its implications for state laws continue to be scrutinized by officials and the public alike.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button