Aditya Dhar’s latest film, Dhurandhar, has stirred significant controversy, promoting bigoted views under the guise of entertainment. Set against the backdrop of the 1999 Kandahar hijacking, the film unfolds a complex narrative that intertwines crime and communal tensions.
Plot Overview
The story follows Ajay Sanyal, portrayed by R. Madhavan, who is the head of the Intelligence Bureau. As he attempts to rally the hostages with a call to nationalism, the atmosphere becomes tense. The silence from the hostages speaks volumes as a Pakistani hijacker mocks Sanyal, stating, “You Hindus are so cowardly.” This moment sets the tone for the film, raising questions about its underlying intent.
Characters and Narrative Choices
Dhar makes several bold narrative choices. Notably, he shifts from a traditional espionage soundtrack to a focus on the underworld of Pakistan. The character of Hamza, played by Ranveer Singh, who is set to infiltrate terror networks, recedes in favor of crime lord Rehman Dakait, portrayed by Akshaye Khanna. Alongside him are characters like cop Chaudhary Aslam and local politician Jameel Jamali, played by Rakesh Bedi.
Thematic Context
The film explores the turmoil in Balochistan and its impact on gang rivalries, adding layers to the conflict. However, despite some predictable plot points, the interactions between characters like Dakait and Aslam maintain viewer engagement. Khanna’s portrayal of the crime kingpin adds a thrilling dimension to the narrative.
Craftsmanship and Technique
Dhar demonstrates notable filmmaking skill, mastering tension and anticipation throughout the film. His clever timing, especially in the introduction of crucial characters, enhances the overall experience. For example, Dakait’s entry is cleverly placed after much anticipation, establishing his presence effectively.
Controversial Themes and Messages
The film, however, raises ethical questions about its messaging. Key scenes depict Pakistan’s officials celebrating violence, showcasing a distorted representation of a faith. The repeated use of the term “kaafir” (infidels) emphasizes the film’s divisive narrative. Such portrayals risk reinforcing negative stereotypes about an entire community.
Dhurandhar’s narrative often seems to prioritize entertainment over compassion, especially regarding sensitive historical events like the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. The film’s focus on vengeance and polarization leads to an absence of empathy towards its subjects.
Conclusion
While Dhurandhar showcases Aditya Dhar’s technical prowess, it ultimately serves as a vehicle for propaganda disguised as entertainment. The film intertwines themes of crime and communal discord, questioning the moral implications of its storytelling. As viewers, we are left to ponder the balance between artistic expression and responsible representation.
