News-us

BBC Accused of Misleading Trump Edit in New Controversy

President Donald Trump’s legal team is threatening to sue the BBC for $1 billion (£759 million) over claims of misleading edits in a recent broadcast. In a formal letter, Trump’s lawyers demand a retraction, an apology, and compensation related to the Panorama program aired by the BBC.

Controversial Broadcast Sparks Legal Action

The BBC has acknowledged the issue, stating that it adheres to high editorial standards. A spokesperson confirmed that the matter is under review following a report by the Telegraph.

January 6 Speech Edited

Trump’s contentious speech on January 6, 2021, included the lines, “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol” and “We fight like hell.” However, in the Panorama broadcast, these statements were edited together, creating a narrative that suggested Trump was inciting violence against the Capitol.

In the Newsnight program, the edited clip presents Trump saying, “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol. And… we fight. We fight like hell.” This was coupled with commentary from presenter Kirsty Wark and imagery of the Capitol riots, implying a direct connection between Trump’s words and the subsequent violence.

Criticism from Former Aides

Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s former chief of staff, criticized the broadcasting method. He pointed out that the editorial choices suggest Trump’s words were spliced to mislead viewers about his intent during the speech.

Allegations of Misleading Editing

  • A whistleblower indicated additional discussions were suppressed following the broadcast.
  • A leaked internal memo alleged that the Panorama program misled audiences by suggesting Trump directly urged violence against the Capitol.
  • The documentary aired just before the upcoming US presidential election in November 2024.

In an interview with Fox News, Trump asserted that his speech was “butchered” and accused the BBC of defrauding viewers with the way it was edited. This legal dispute highlights the tense relationship between media outlets and public figures in the context of political events.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button