Recent videos have surfaced showing federal agents using questionable tactics during immigration protests, including chokeholds and aggressive crowd control measures. These incidents have raised concerns about compliance with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policies on the use of force. DHS guidelines dictate that force should be utilized only when safer alternatives are not available.
Federal Review of Protest Tactics
Eric Balliet, a former federal agent with over 20 years of experience, analyzed footage from various protests. His review focused on the techniques employed by agents, which he believes do not align with established protocols. “This isn’t policing and law enforcement as I practiced it for 25 years,” Balliet commented.
Contentious Use of Force Policies
The situation escalated in cities like Chicago and Portland, where federal agents have been accused of using excessive force. In response, protesters have filed a lawsuit regarding these tactics, particularly those orchestrated under the command of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) commander Gregory Bovino. In a recent ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Sara L. Ellis issued an order limiting the use of chemical sprays and other non-lethal weapons.
Key Findings on Use of Force
- Targeting of Individuals: Videos show agents firing less-lethal munitions at demonstrators’ heads and torsos, which is against DHS policy.
- Close-Range Deployment of Tear Gas: Agents used pepper spray and tear gas excessively, often at close distances, raising safety concerns.
- Vehicle Maneuvers: Footage captured agents using unmarked vehicles to approach and push demonstrators, categorizing such tactics as potentially lethal.
- Prohibited Chokeholds: Instances of chokeholds were documented, which are only permitted under specific conditions defined by DHS policy.
Specific Incidents Under Review
A notable incident involved a priest in Broadview, Illinois, who was struck by a pepper ball. Balliet noted that firing at individuals above the waist is strictly against agent protocols. Similarly, in Portland, an agent sprayed tear gas directly at a protester’s face at close range, lacking justifiable provocation.
Commander’s Defense and Criticism
Commander Bovino defended his agents’ actions, suggesting that any harm resulting from interactions was the protesters’ responsibility. Balliet has criticized this stance, explaining the importance of proper training and accountability in maintaining public trust in law enforcement.
In conclusion, the video analyses conducted by Eric Balliet reveal significant concerns regarding the tactics employed by federal agents during protests. As the DHS prepares to revise its use-of-force guidelines, the scrutiny will likely continue amidst ongoing public debates about the appropriate use of federal authority in such volatile situations.
