On November 9, 2025, approximately 13,000 individuals gathered at the Bell Centre in Montreal to voice their opposition to Law 2. Organized by several medical federations, the rally aimed to compel Premier François Legault’s government to reconsider the controversial legislation.
Concerns Over Law 2
The gathering included members from the Quebec Medical Student Federation (FMEQ), the Quebec Federation of Medical Residents (FMRQ), the Quebec Federation of General Practitioners (FMOQ), and the Quebec Federation of Specialist Physicians (FMSQ). They expressed significant concern regarding the law’s potential impact on the healthcare system and patient access to essential medical services.
- Participants: Doctors and healthcare professionals from various federations.
- Date: November 9, 2025.
- Location: Bell Centre, Montreal.
- Estimated Attendance: 13,000 individuals.
Key Issues Raised
Law 2 aims to modify physician compensation structures, impose performance targets, and introduce potential sanctions for non-compliance. Critics described the legislation as an “authoritarian drift” and a system that lacks the necessary resources for implementation.
FMEQ Vice President Félicia Harvey emphasized that physicians should not be burdened with healthcare system failures. Dr. Louis-Charles Desbiens, FMRQ President, criticized the government’s approach, stating that physicians lack adequate support and resources.
Voices from the Medical Community
Various doctors raised alarms about the implications of Law 2. Dr. Lyne Couture from the Laurentides-Lanaudière General Practitioners Association warned that the law puts the entire healthcare system at risk. Dr. Corinne Leclercq from the FMSQ argued that the legislation could weaken the patient-physician relationship.
- Quote from Dr. Isabelle Gagnon: “I’m worried about patient access to care.”
- Concerns: High turnover rates among medical professionals and a dwindling workforce.
Government Response
In light of the protests, the cabinet of Health Minister Christian Dubé acknowledged the concerns expressed by healthcare professionals. They stated their commitment to ongoing discussions to clarify the changes introduced by Law 2.
Despite the backlash, the government maintains that the reforms are essential for enhancing access to care for the public.
Conclusion
As the debate surrounding Law 2 continues, the medical community remains vigilant. With significant implications for both healthcare providers and patients, this situation reflects ongoing tensions in Quebec’s healthcare system. The outcome of this protest may very well shape the future of medical practice and patient care in the province.
