The legal confrontation between former fiancé Patrick Bryant and U.S. Representative Nancy Mace escalated this week as Bryant filed a lawsuit against her. The suit stems from allegations made by Mace, who labeled him a sexual predator in a House speech earlier this year.
Details of the Lawsuit
Filed in Charleston, South Carolina, the lawsuit claims that Mace fabricated allegations surrounding a 2018 incident of sexual assault. Bryant argues that these claims are not only false but were designed to blackmail him.
Background of the Case
The initial accusations emerged from a May lawsuit by “Jane Doe,” who alleged that she was assaulted in the home of Eric Bowman. It was claimed that Bowman and Bryant recorded the incident. Mace mentioned this incident during her speech in February, intensifying the scrutiny on Bryant.
Allegations Against Mace
In his lawsuit, Bryant contends that Mace collaborated with Bowman’s estranged wife to create a false narrative about the incident involving Doe, who previously worked for him. He asserts that Mace alleged he was cheating during their engagement, leading her to hack his phone in an attempt to secure ownership of their properties.
Contentions of Bryant
- Bryant asserts he and other men did not harm Doe in October 2018.
- He claims that while Bowman’s estranged wife alleged she witnessed the assault via a security system, she did not inform Doe that evening.
- The lawsuit includes charges of defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Response from Nancy Mace
Mace responded to Bryant’s lawsuit, implying that he was attempting to extort her further. In her statement, she mentioned a recent court ruling against Bryant that found he and his legal team violated state law by improperly issuing subpoenas in the case connected to Doe.
This developing story highlights the tense and complex legal battles surrounding allegations of misconduct and the implications they have for the individuals involved. As events unfold, both parties face significant public scrutiny.
