Mehdi Hasan on JD Vance’s Remarks: Hindus Realize Christian Allies Falter

Mehdi Hasan, a British Muslim journalist, recently shared his perspective on Vice President JD Vance’s remarks regarding his Hindu wife, Usha. Vance’s comments suggest a hope that Usha might eventually embrace Christian beliefs, which has sparked criticism from various groups.
Vance’s Controversial Comments
In a recent interview, Vance made a statement that has generated significant backlash. He expressed a desire for his wife, who was raised in a Hindu household, to be “moved by the same thing that moved me in church.” This comment has been perceived as dismissive of Hindu practices and reflective of Christian nationalist themes.
Reactions from the Hindu Community
- The Hindu American Foundation (HAF) responded strongly to Vance’s statements.
- They urged him to engage with Hinduism and respect Usha’s beliefs if he expects her to adopt Christian values.
- HAF emphasized Hinduism’s inclusive nature, stating it does not expect spouses to conform to a single religious perspective.
In their response, HAF also highlighted an increase in anti-Hindu sentiment online, often stemming from explicitly Christian sources. This context heightened the sensitivity surrounding Vance’s remarks.
Vance’s Defense
As public criticism escalated, Vance defended his comments, labeling the backlash as “disgusting.” He claimed that his wife encouraged him to reconnect with his faith and clarified that she does not intend to convert. Vance stated, “Like many interfaith couples, I hope she may one day see things as I do.”
Hasan’s Stand on the Issue
Mehdi Hasan actively joined the conversation, addressing the Hindu American Foundation. He suggested that Vance’s remarks serve as a critical reminder for conservative non-Christian groups. In his post, Hasan stated, “Conservative Jews and conservative Hindus who threw in with Trump and the GOP are now belatedly realizing what some of us tried to warn them: that the Christian nationalists of the MAGA GOP are not their friends.”
This commentary underlines a growing awareness of the complex dynamics between different religious affiliations within the political landscape.




