Over 20 States Sue EPA for Canceling Solar Power Grants

More than 20 states have initiated legal action against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the abrupt cancelation of a crucial solar power initiative. This initiative, known as “Solar For All,” was designed to facilitate accessibility to solar energy for low-income households and had a funding allocation of $7 billion.
Background on the Solar For All Program
Established in 2022 under the Inflation Reduction Act, the Solar For All program aimed to support the deployment of rooftop and community solar projects. This initiative was part of the Biden administration’s broader strategy to diminish carbon emissions and expand solar energy access to approximately one million additional U.S. households.
EPA’s Decision to Cancel the Program
In August, the EPA announced the cancellation of the Solar For All program. This decision included a withdrawal of about 90% of the grants that states had been awarded. The legal action challenges this move, asserting that the EPA exceeded its authority by unilaterally terminating a program approved by Congress.
States Involved in the Lawsuit
- Washington
- Arizona
- Minnesota
These states are led by Democratic attorneys general and governors. They believe that the cancellation jeopardizes significant funding, including approximately $156 million for Washington state alone.
Claims Against the EPA
The complaint, filed in the Western District of Washington, accuses the EPA of violating the Administrative Procedures Act. It claims that the agency improperly terminated a program that had secured congressional approval.
Additionally, this lawsuit is part of a broader effort by states to contest the reductions in clean energy funding implemented by the previous administration. Other complaints have emerged, including one in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, asserting that the EPA violated individual grant agreements when it reclaimed funds.
Impact on Employment and Energy Access
Experts estimate that the EPA’s cancellation will adversely affect close to a million people, denying them affordable solar energy options. This action could also result in the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs in the solar industry.
Conclusion
The ongoing legal challenges highlight the tension between state governments and federal agencies over clean energy initiatives. As these lawsuits progress, the future of the Solar For All program and similar initiatives hangs in the balance.